The pussy-liberals on the left want the destruction of America as we know it. Not only do they hate GW Bush because he beat their last two pathetic excuses of men and leadership, they hate the Republic that we currently have, because in a Republic, "the people" actually have some of the power...and The Left doesn't want "the people" to have ANY power. Rather, The Left wants us to be happy with the crumbs of a vast welfare system and some government cheese and be damn grateful for it! Nevermind that the true elitists are in the Far Left. Ted Kennedy and his ilk only know that taxes are for the puny public who actually work for a living.
Unfortunately, the Republican "leadership" takes everything the liberals put out, so the liberals put out even more, emboldened like the liberals embolden the terrorists. We have true patriots like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin and Ollie North and David Hunt...but they aren't the leaders. Our leaders are quivering purse dogs. Now...let Ann loose with some real POWER!...that would be GOOD for America!! That would be something to see! THAT would be it's own chapter in the history books! I may not be the sharpest pencil in the box, but I'm a pencil, and I'm smart enough to know that the Republicans SUCK at PR and letting America know where they stand and what's what. So, the Left still lies and gets away with sedition, treason and outright stupidity.

Michelle Malkin brought up, in her newest RedStatesUSA article, an ad by MAC cosmetics featuring Sandra Bernhard spouting her typical political scat while hawking lip gloss. I perceive this as part of a seeming trend in advertising these days, as advertisers try to push the envelope of "appropriateness" in their ads. Example: The Amp'd Mobile add where the guy (at the end of the ad) is bleeped when he uses the "S" word. Or the ad (that did get changed...and I helped!) with the tag line "You bet your sweet Aspercreme". Or even the anti-smoking ads by a website called "Whaddafxup?". Sound it out, and it doesn't leave anything to the imagination. We even had a local car dealership end an ad with "Love you long time". I emailed them and asked them, "What's next?, 'Sucky sucky five dollar?". The pulled the ad. Now you have a cosmetics firm using a has-been third-rate actress who is noted for her pussy-liberal political views as their spokesperson in an ad that uses the "B" word. What's next? Michael Moore doing McDonalds ads? Nils is right...advertisers live in their own little world. What we need is a grass-roots effort of conservatives in this country to boycott products of the liberals...especially Hollywood...and let our pocketbooks be our voice...and hit them where it hurts them the most...their money.

Michelle Malkin brought up, in her newest RedStatesUSA article, an ad by MAC cosmetics featuring Sandra Bernhard spouting her typical political scat while hawking lip gloss. I perceive this as part of a seeming trend in advertising these days, as advertisers try to push the envelope of "appropriateness" in their ads. Example: The Amp'd Mobile add where the guy (at the end of the ad) is bleeped when he uses the "S" word. Or the ad (that did get changed...and I helped!) with the tag line "You bet your sweet Aspercreme". Or even the anti-smoking ads by a website called "Whaddafxup?". Sound it out, and it doesn't leave anything to the imagination. We even had a local car dealership end an ad with "Love you long time". I emailed them and asked them, "What's next?, 'Sucky sucky five dollar?". The pulled the ad. Now you have a cosmetics firm using a has-been third-rate actress who is noted for her pussy-liberal political views as their spokesperson in an ad that uses the "B" word. What's next? Michael Moore doing McDonalds ads? Nils is right...advertisers live in their own little world. What we need is a grass-roots effort of conservatives in this country to boycott products of the liberals...especially Hollywood...and let our pocketbooks be our voice...and hit them where it hurts them the most...their money.

I think the only people surprised by the staging of photos and manipulation of photos are the propagandists of Hezbollah and their ilk, along with the pussy-liberal media, that someone figured it out; and the main-stream leftists who don't want to believe that "stuff is made up". It of course begs one to ponder how many other "fauxtographic" images (what a great term from a blogger!) have been pandered to tug at the heart-strings of the world...and in the process, change attitudes and thusly outcomes. The terrorist organizations all know very well how easy it is to BS America and they know if they can turn public opinion, they can win...and they are pretty successful at it because our mainstream media falls right in line for them...and even when they KNOW it's happening right in front of their noses, is that a story in and of itself? Nope!, not until it's uncovered do they happen to mention it. Dan Rather could easily get a job as a Hezbollah journalist if his new job as a cable hack doesn't work out. Keep the truth alive, Michelle Malkin, for only by the efforts of you and those like you does the truth make it to us.

How sad and disgusting is a party that shuns Hillary and Lieberman, seemingly as "too conservative", because of a single issue like The War on Terror?! Ann's points are so succinctly confirmed by the actions of the left, it doesn't even seem like much of a challenge to her anymore. Z-Man's point about conservative "in-action" is true, but it's because we have no clear leadership. All the patriots are commenting on what's going on instead of affecting what's going on. Hell, I'd make a great President because I'd be surrounded by people like Ann Coulter and David Hunt to give me advice...but I'm nobody. We need Ann and David and Ollie and Bill and Sean and Michelle and Debbie and Newt to LEAD. Who else has the name-recognition, which is paramount to our "American Idol" society? The Greatest Generation are aging past the positions of leadership, and I'm certain are sick to their stomach that the pussy-liberals who comprise about 1/2 of their offspring (look in the dictionary under "hippie") are doing their best to make our country now what they were protesting for in the 60's. Socialism, emasculated cops, no military, "world government", no religion...and they are getting their wish. So...either vote for me for President, or let's get someone in the game that has the balls to do the right thing as well as "the name".

I hope that Michelle Malkin and those patriotic journalists like her continue to point out the obvious...and hopefully the not-so-obvious...lies and mis-leadings of the liberal press. For so long they had carte-blanche with what America saw...and it truly makes me wonder how much else was staged, and later during the "PhotoShop" years, altered? They're doing it now...that tells me they did it in the past and there is even more that you can't believe. It also fascinates me how the pussy-liberals can truly seem to rationalize their lies and machinations..."their end justifies the means". After all, we ARE entitled to THEIR opinion. Liberalism...where everything is made up and the truth don't matter. Keep on 'em Michelle!!

Fanatical Muslims faking death scenes to inflame outrage against "the infidels"? Preposterous! Pffftthfffthlblblbthhtfffthh!!!! Sorry, I knew I couldn't say that and keep a straight face. If they can use innocent civilians as shields, knowing that some of them will be killed, I have no doubt that they would stage scenes to be far worse than they are if they don't get the result they want...dead civilians. They kill innocents with car bombs and IEDs...why wouldn't they deliberately put civilians at risk of artillery and air attack by "the infidels"? It serves only their purpose...and similar to the liberals in our country...their purpose is more important than anything. Islam a religion of peace? I won't believe it until the Muslims of our world eradicate the Islamo-fascist fanatics that are a cancer to their religion. I haven't seen that AT ALL. I've seen plenty of "normal" Muslims dancing with joy whenever "infidels" die...but I don't see them purging the fanatics from their religion. A Christian fanatic try to convert you to their church, or if you're already there, take a bunch of your money. A Muslim fanatic wants to kill you. Perhaps all of Islam needs to be purged...they haven't done anything worthwhile for the world during their entire existence. I'm all for freedom of religion...but when religion wants me dead...well, I have a problem with that.